Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344972›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Algorithmic inclusion? The role of AI-assisted inclusive leadership in shaping gendered outcomes in multicultural academic teams.

Iram Tahir, M Sebnem Ensari, Khuram Shahzad, Rahat G Kazmi, Ahmad Abu Arja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iram TahirUniversity of Greater Manchester, Bolton, United Kingdom.
M Sebnem EnsariUniversity of Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Khuram ShahzadUniversity of Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Rahat G KazmiUniversity of Greater Manchester, Bolton, United Kingdom.
Ahmad Abu ArjaUniversity of Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) adoption across Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) has gained considerable momentum, and is now being used for faculty recruitment, promotion, workload allocation, research impact evaluation and student assessments. Notwithstanding the objectivity and efficiency that AI brings, its deployment within historically gendered academic institutions raises concerns about the perpetuation and reproduction of structural inequalities. This conceptual paper proposes a governance framework for AI-assisted inclusive leadership focused on gender equality in multicultural teams. AI systems operate within institutional contexts and mediate the relationship between leadership, governance and equity. The paper proposes four institutional solutions; human-in-the-loop deliberation, transparent AI protocols, routine equity audits, and interdisciplinary oversight committees, as mechanisms for mitigating algorithmic bias and enhancing institutional reflexivity. The paper also introduces a four-stage governance maturity framework as an iterative approach to ethical AI inclusion in inclusive leadership of multi-cultural teams. The paper argues that only through a strategic thought-leadership approach to AI inclusion in Higher Education Institutions can structural gender inequalities in multicultural teams be addressed through redesigning of productivity metrics, recognition of emotional and invisible labour, and by addressing gender-embeddedness in institutional systems.

Indexed as

AI-assisted inclusive leadershipalgorithmic biasgender equalityHigher Education Institutionsmulticultural teamstransformative governance

Identifiers

PMID42344972
PMCPMC13286852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.