ReviewBritish journal of biomedical science2026
Challenges and emerging strategies for genome-wide evaluation of loss of imprinting in cancer.
Review in British journal of biomedical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is the phenomenon in which only a single allele of a gene is expressed based on its parental origin, thereby deviating from the typical biallelic expression of autosomal genes. It is meticulously controlled by epigenetic mechanisms, particularly DNA methylation. Imprinted loci are crucial for regulating growth during early development, and anomalies in imprinting can lead to congenital syndromes such as Beckwith-Wiedemann's and Prader-Willi's. Similarly, many cancers exhibit dysregulated imprinting patterns, putatively contributing to tumour growth. Yet, the assessment of imprinting in cancer is complex due to technical challenges, impeding clinical research and the translation of novel insight to the clinic. This review starts with a general introduction to imprinting, its (dys)regulation and key clinical findings in cancer and beyond. Then, we summarize common methods used to characterize normal imprinting and aberrations in cancer. Subsequently, we discuss how the interpretation of such findings is complicated by technical challenges, such as tumour impurity, the requirement for heterozygosity to distinguish between maternal and paternal alleles and the presence of tissue- and transcript-specific imprinting patterns. We further delve into state-of-the-art methods able to mitigate these challenges. Finally, we discuss how future methodological innovations, particularly by integrating single-cell and single-molecule based methods, may further facilitate a straightforward characterization of imprinting dysregulation and its underlying causes, and guide the development of clinical tests. Thus, by integrating recent advances and proposing innovative approaches, our review aims to provide a comprehensive overview for cancer researchers and clinicians to facilitate cancer imprinting research and its translation to the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.