Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344938›Full record

ArticleBioscience2026

Beyond scents: calling on the fragrance industry to champion plant diversity.

Luiza F A de Paula, Rhian J Smith, Vanessa Handley, Tiago P Gomes, Raphael Ocelli Pinheiro, Alexandre Antonelli, Peggy L Fiedler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luiza F A de PaulaDepartment of Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Federal University of Minas Gerais, 6627 Pres. Antônio Carlos Avenue, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3818-7363
Rhian J SmithRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2836-0246
Vanessa HandleyThe Red List Project, 870 Creed Road, Oakland, CA, 94610, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3661-8462
Tiago P GomesFama re.capital, 134 Olimpíadas Street, conj. 42, Vila Olímpia, São Paulo, SP, 04551-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4590-4385
Raphael Ocelli PinheiroDepartment of Ecology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Campus Universitário Lagoa Nova, Rua das Biociências, Natal, RN, 59078-970, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7459-5981
Alexandre AntonelliRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1842-9297
Peggy L FiedlerThe Red List Project, 870 Creed Road, Oakland, CA, 94610, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-3758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the Convention on Biological Diversity (1992), international frameworks have emphasized benefit-sharing and private-sector engagement in conservation, a call reinforced by the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (2022). Yet biodiversity continues to decline, highlighting the need for funding models that effectively link commerce with conservation. Here, we examine how the fragrance industry-a sector deeply dependent on plant diversity and cultural value chains-can contribute more meaningfully to global plant conservation. Drawing on international policy frameworks, published literature, and illustrative conservation-industry partnerships, we assess mechanisms through which fragrance-related initiatives support biodiversity protection, accountability, and culturally grounded conservation narratives. We then examine The Red List Project as a conservation-first model that integrates biodiversity objectives directly into fragranced product development, using scent inspiration rather than wild harvesting. We argue that scaling such approaches could reposition the fragrance industry as an active partner in safeguarding plant diversity, biocultural heritage, and equitable benefit-sharing.

Indexed as

bioprospectingcorporate engagementintangible heritageKunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity FrameworkRed List

Identifiers

PMID42344938
PMCPMC13289612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.