Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344935›Full record

ArticleBioscience2026

From Knowledge to Action: Next Steps for the Natural Science Collections Community.

Elizabeth R Ellwood, Gil Nelson, Breda Zimkus, John Bates, Joseph A Cook, Jyotsna Pandey, Emily Sessa, Matthew Borths, Jillian Goodwin, David Jennings and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elizabeth R EllwoodiDigBio, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1602-1917
Gil NelsoniDigBio, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7851-4445
Breda ZimkusMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8973-526X
John BatesNegaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5809-5941
Joseph A CookMuseum of Southwestern Biology, Biology Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Jyotsna PandeyNatural Science Collections Alliance, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8173-0424
Emily SessaNew York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6496-5536
Matthew BorthsDuke Lemur Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3840-5308
Jillian GoodwiniDigBio, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1791-391X
David JenningsiDigBio, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0520-6983
Pamela S SoltisiDigBio, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9310-8659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following decades of increasing collaboration and organization, the United States natural science collections community is uniting around the creation of a national center supporting biological collections. Community consultations identified eight major themes that a center could encompass to manage, unify, and strategically expand the vast specimen/sample infrastructure and associated data stored in biological collections, address challenges facing physical biodiversity collections, and, importantly, coordinate across diverse research and education sectors. The center would foster workforce development, ethical collaboration with Indigenous communities, expand a digital infrastructure to provide broad access to collections data, and innovation in fields like artificial intelligence for data capture, management, and analysis. Ultimately, a center would provide sustainable, long-term government and private support for biodiversity science that integrates the use of biological collections to foster innovations and networks that address critical societal challenges and benefit public health, environmental conservation, and the bioeconomy.

Indexed as

action centerbiodiversityCenter for Biocollections Integration and Transformationdigital extended specimennatural science collections

Identifiers

PMID42344935
PMCPMC13289605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.