Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344850›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

ADAPT: a programme for the advanced detection of AI-enabled pathogenic threats.

Hanna Palya, Cassidy Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanna PalyaInstitute for Global Pandemic Planning, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Cassidy NelsonCentre for Long-Term Resilience, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in AI are expanding both the ceiling and the accessibility of biological engineering, creating threats that existing synthetic nucleic acid screening is not equipped to detect. The IARPA-funded Functional Genomic and Computational Assessment of Threats (FunGCAT) programme advanced screening by creating tools specialised for sequence screening and by progressing on the annotation of potential sequences of concern. However, 3 years after the conclusion of FunGCAT, critical gaps remain: (1) the field lacks an operationalisable definition of what makes a sequence a biosecurity concern, and (2) current tools cannot detect threats on the basis of function rather than sequence similarity. To close these gaps, we propose the Advanced Detection of AI-enabled Pathogenic Threats (ADAPT) programme in two phases as a successor to FunGCAT. ADAPT Phase I would develop a multi-attribute, function-based definition of sequences of concern and generate the benchmark datasets. Phase II would develop and validate screening tools capable of detecting known threats, AI-paraphrased functional homologues, and, where possible, AI-designed novel threats. Continuous governance workstreams would translate technical outputs into regulatory guidance and maintain secure infrastructure. ADAPT builds on FunGCAT's legacy and the subsequent work of the synthetic nucleic acid screening community, while adapting to an era in which biological AI models can generate functional sequences bearing little resemblance to any previously characterised sequence.

Indexed as

Biodefense policybiological AI modelsdual-use research of concern (DURC)function-based screeninggene ontology (GO)protein language modelssequences of concern (SOC)synthetic nucleic acid screening

Identifiers

PMID42344850
PMCPMC13286858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.