ArticleCureus2026
Discordance Between Cross-Sectional Imaging and Pathology: A Rare Case of Xanthogranulomatous Inflammation of the Caecum and Appendix.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-sectional imaging of colonic pathology is usually correlated with other investigations, such as optical colonoscopy (OC), prior to surgical treatment. However, in acute inflammation, surgery may proceed based on imaging alone. This case describes a 78-year-old woman presenting with dyspnoea, fatigue, and weight loss. An unprepared computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated evidence of caecal wall thickening suggestive of malignancy. Colonoscopy was omitted in this case due to the possibility of perforation, and an elective right hemicolectomy was subsequently performed. Results on histopathology inspection revealed xanthogranulomatous inflammation (XGI) without dysplasia or malignancy. While CT, including CT colonography, plays an increasing role in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis and assessment, differentiating malignancy from benign inflammation on cross-sectional imaging alone remains challenging, and OC with biopsy remains the diagnostic gold standard. Although rare, especially in the context of the caecum and appendix, XGI should be considered by clinicians, radiologists and pathologists as a differential diagnosis when CRC is suspected clinically and radiologically, without biopsy confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.