ReviewCureus2026
Oral Small-Molecule Therapies Versus Biologic Agents in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review of Pivotal Phase 3 Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of oral small-molecule therapies and biologic agents in adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Evidence from eight landmark publications encompassing multiple pivotal phase 3 randomized controlled trials was synthesized to assess induction and maintenance outcomes across distinct therapeutic mechanisms, including intracellular cytokine signaling inhibition, immune trafficking modulation, and extracellular pathway blockade. The findings suggest that oral small-molecule therapies demonstrate clinically meaningful efficacy comparable to established biologic agents while offering practical advantages related to oral administration and mechanistic diversity. Distinct differences in induction and maintenance performance across therapeutic classes highlight the importance of goal-directed therapy selection, individualized risk stratification, and mechanism-based treatment sequencing rather than class cycling alone. Overall, this review underscores the evolving role of oral therapies as integral components of contemporary UC management while emphasizing the need to balance efficacy, safety considerations, and patient-centered treatment priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.