ArticleCureus2026
Unruptured Ectopic Pregnancy at Eight Weeks in a Woman With an Intrauterine Device.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ectopic pregnancy, a rare entity, represents a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the first trimester, with the fallopian tube being the most common implantation site. While intrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective contraceptives that reduce overall pregnancy risk, contraceptive failure with an IUD in situ is associated with a slightly higher rate of ectopic pregnancy compared to women not using contraception. This case report describes an 8-week and 4-day unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy in a 38-year-old multiparous woman with a well-positioned 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (L-IUD) that had been in place for one year. The patient presented with breast tenderness and a positive pregnancy test but was otherwise asymptomatic, with no pelvic pain or vaginal bleeding. She underwent successful laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy and was discharged within 24 hours without complications. This case highlights the importance of maintaining clinical vigilance for ectopic pregnancy in women with IUDs, even in the absence of typical symptoms, and demonstrates that advanced gestational age tubal pregnancies can remain unruptured. Clinicians should consider ectopic pregnancy from the differential diagnosis in asymptomatic women with IUDs who present with a positive pregnancy test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.