ArticleComputer methods in applied mechanics and engineering2026
Monotone Peridynamic Neural Operator for Nonlinear Material Modeling with Conditionally Unique Solutions.
Article in Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Interpretable PDEs: Harmonizing Fourier Insights with Attention for Scalable and Interpretable Physics Discovery.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025Article
- HETEROGENEOUS PERIDYNAMIC NEURAL OPERATORS: DISCOVER BIOTISSUE CONSTITUTIVE LAW AND MICROSTRUCTURE FROM DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION MEASUREMENTS.Foundations of data science (Springfield, Mo.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonlocal continuum mechanics models, including peridynamics, have emerged as powerful tools for describing the mechanical responses of complex nonlinear materials. In typical applications of peridynamics, the functional form of the material model is prescribed in advance, based on the analyst's preferences and insight, creating the need for time-consuming calibration and validation for the particular material at hand. Although data-driven methods were proposed to streamline the modeling process, the well-posedness of these learned peridynamic models is generally not guaranteed, which creates the possibility of non-physical solutions in downstream simulation tasks. In this study, we address this challenge of developing an accurate data-driven model with known uniqueness properties. To do this, we introduce the monotone peridynamic neural operator (MPNO), a novel approach for learning a data-driven nonlocal constitutive model with guaranteed well-posedness for certain classes of problems. Our approach learns a nonlocal kernel together with a nonlinear constitutive relation, while ensuring solution uniqueness through a monotone gradient network. This architectural constraint on the gradient induces the convexity of the learnt energy density function. This guarantees the uniqueness of solutions in the small deformation regime. To validate our approach, we evaluate MPNO's performance on both synthetic and real-world datasets. On synthetic datasets generated with a manufactured kernel and constitutive relation, we show, both theoretically and numerically, that the learnt model converges to the ground-truth as the measurement grid size decreases. Additionally, our MPNO exhibits superior generalization capabilities in comparison with conventional neural networks. It yields smaller displacement solution errors in down-stream tasks with unseen loadings that are outside of the distribution of training samples. Finally, we showcase the practical utility of our approach through applications in learning a homogenized model from molecular dynamics data, highlighting the model's expressivity and physical interpretability in real-world scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.