ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
From Traditional to Eco-Friendly Dentistry: Assessing the Promising Sustainability Outlook in Saudi Arabia.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Traditional to Eco-Friendly Dentistry: Assessing the Promising Sustainability Outlook in Saudi Arabia.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dentistry is a resource-hungry segment that produces a lot of waste and also consumes more energy and water. Transitioning toward environmentally sustainable dental practices is essential for reducing the environmental burden of dental services in Saudi Arabia, but there is limited evidence on the subject. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to explore the knowledge of eco-friendly dental practices, their existing adoption, and the barriers to the adoption of dental practitioners and clinic directors in Saudi Arabia. Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional mixed-method design. It comprised the quantitative stage, which included a structured questionnaire of 200 dentists or clinic directors working in dental clinics in Riyadh, through six domains: medical devices and equipment, dental amalgam, imaging, paper, energy, and water management. The qualitative step involved six semistructured interviews with key stakeholders in various parts of Saudi Arabia, which were analyzed on the premise of a thematic approach as developed by Braun and Clarke. Two phases were combined to provide a more comprehensive picture of the adoption patterns and the potential impediments. Findings: Digital imaging, energy efficiency, and paper management had high adoption rates. By contrast, lower implementation was found among reusable syringes, cups, protective packaging, sensor water taps, and renewable energy sources, although the awareness of implementation was high. The most prominent barriers included insufficient training ( Conclusion: Saudi dental clinics appear to be progressing toward sustainability, but specific training programs, monetary incentives, and institutional policy are the key elements that are needed to address the gap between awareness and the application of environmentally friendly operations. The results bring priority areas to the forefront and provide practical learning inquiries to policymakers and professional organizations in the dentistry profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.