Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344768›Full record

ReviewJournal of epilepsy research2026

Self-Management Intervention for Adults with Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.

Seung Ae Kim, Dong Wook Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of epilepsy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seung Ae KimCollege of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Wook KimDepartment of Neurology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating self-management interventions for adult patients with epilepsy, examine their characteristics and effects, and suggest suitable intervention strategies for clinical application. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in five databases: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. RCTs published between January 2019 and October 2024 were included. Eight eligible studies were selected and analyzed in terms of intervention content, duration, frequency, delivery method, and outcome measures, including quality of life, self-management ability, and self-efficacy. Among the eight included studies, statistically significant improvements were reported in quality of life in three studies (37.5%), self-management ability in three studies (37.5%), and self-efficacy in two studies (25.0%). Interventions conducted over 6 months with biweekly or weekly sessions tended to show more favorable outcomes. Face-to-face education and telephone-based support were commonly used and were associated with positive results. Digital interventions, such as mobile applications, showed limited effectiveness when used alone but tended to be more effective when interactive features were included. These findings suggest that a hybrid approach combining initial face-to-face education with ongoing telephone or digital support may be appropriate for adults with epilepsy. A 6-month intervention period with regular biweekly or weekly sessions may be optimal. For digital tools, interactive components should be integrated to sustain engagement and enhance outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultsEpilepsyNursing careRandomized controlled trialSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID42344768
PMCPMC13287433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.