ArticleJournal of epilepsy research2026
Preliminary Validation of the Epileptic Seizure Trigger Questionnaire for Perceived Seizure Triggers in Adults with Epilepsy.
Article in Journal of epilepsy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Seizure triggers-such as stress, sleep deprivation, and missed medication-are commonly reported by patients with epilepsy. Understanding these perceived triggers is critical for patient counseling and preventive strategies. However, no validated self-report instrument exists to systematically assess them. To develop and conduct a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the epileptic seizure trigger questionnaire (EST-Q). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study with 100 adults with active epilepsy recruited from two public hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The initial 12-item questionnaire was refined into an 11-item instrument after removing one poorly performing item. Psychometric evaluation was conducted exclusively on the seven-item core module, after exclusion of four items with high non-response rates. Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency assessment, and item response theory (IRT). Given the modest sample size, confirmatory factor analysis and IRT findings were interpreted as exploratory and preliminary. Results: The seven-item core suggested a predominantly unidimensional structure (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin=0.578; variance explained=29.7%), with borderline internal consistency (α=0.699; ω=0.681), which is adequate for group-level research but insufficient for individual clinical decisions, and moderate to high item discrimination. The four excluded items remain clinically relevant but were unsuitable for psychometric evaluation due to limited applicability. Conclusions: The EST-Q shows promise as a standardized tool for assessing perceived seizure triggers. These preliminary findings support its potential utility, but validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is needed to confirm its factor structure, reliability, and generalizability before routine clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.