ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2026
Risk factors for revision amputation and infection after definitive closure of traumatic amputations: a retrospective cohort study at a Level I academic trauma center.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for revision amputation and postoperative infection after definitive closure of traumatic amputations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with traumatic lower extremity amputation or injuries requiring amputation during the initial operative intervention at a level one trauma center between January 2005 and April 2024. Patients under 18 or without an acute fracture in the amputated limb were excluded. Collected variables included mechanism of injury, time to antibiotics and debridement, and final amputation level. Computed tomography angiography abnormalities, tourniquet use, gross contamination, injury severity score, and body mass index (BMI) were compared using Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney nonparametric tests. Results: Eighty-six patients (mean age 44.9 ± 16.9 years) met inclusion criteria. Nearly half were smokers (48%) with an average BMI of 29.3 ± 7.1; the median injury severity score was 22. Tourniquets were present on arrival in 40% of cases. Although most presented with tibia-level amputations, 37% ultimately required above- or through-knee amputation. These patients were more likely to have American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status scores ≥4 (39% vs 13%, Conclusion: Revision amputation after definitive stump closure was associated with both patient and treatment-related factors, particularly higher BMI and the need for additional debridement. When feasible, preservation of a below-knee amputation was associated with better functional outcomes, underscoring the role of thoughtful surgical planning and attention to infection control in optimizing outcomes after traumatic lower extremity amputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.