Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344723›Full record

ReviewChemical science2026

Electrocatalytic methane oxidation

Hui-Jian Zhang, Xiao-Tong Wang, Luxiao Zhou, Jiguang Deng, Zhong-Wen Liu, Zhao-Qing Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui-Jian ZhangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Technology Beijing 100124 P. R. China jgdeng@bjut.edu.cn.
Xiao-Tong WangDepartment School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University Guangzhou 510006 China lzqgzu@gzhu.edu.cn.
Luxiao ZhouDepartment School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University Guangzhou 510006 China lzqgzu@gzhu.edu.cn.
Jiguang DengSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Technology Beijing 100124 P. R. China jgdeng@bjut.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7768-3688
Zhong-Wen LiuSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University Xi'an 710119 China zwliu@snnu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4458-4998
Zhao-Qing LiuDepartment School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University Guangzhou 510006 China lzqgzu@gzhu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0727-7809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocatalytic methane oxidation (EMO) offers a promising approach by utilizing renewable electricity to drive electron-transfer reactions, enabling C-H bond activation and transformation into value-added chemicals at ambient temperature and pressure while offering advantages in sustainability and process control. However, challenges such as the inherent inertness of methane, its low solubility in conventional electrolytes, and tendencies toward over-oxidation severely limit catalytic efficiency. This review summarizes recent advances in EMO across three key scales. At atomic and molecular scales, mechanisms of C-H bond activation through direct electron transfer and reactive oxygen species are discussed. At the catalyst and microenvironment level, practical strategies to enhance catalysis are reviewed, including structural modification, heterogeneous interfaces, single-atom or dual-atom catalysis, and electrolyte/reactor designs. At the macroscopic transport level, methods to optimize methane transport

Identifiers

PMID42344723
PMCPMC13288077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.