ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Advanced magnetic resonance neurography for preoperative facial nerve assessment and surgical planning in parotid tumors: a review of current evidence and surgical translation.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional parotid surgery has historically relied on indirect anatomical landmarks, which often fail when faced with pathological distortions. This narrative review evaluates the clinical utility of advanced magnetic resonance neurography and 3D modeling for preoperative facial nerve assessment, aiming to bridge the gap between radiological advancements and practical surgical planning. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to evaluate mature clinical tools and experimental techniques. We assessed high-resolution MRI sequences, quantitative diffusion metrics, and radiomic analysis, focusing on their ability to provide supportive planning information and their reported associations with clinical outcomes. Current evidence confirms that advanced imaging sequences enable reliable visualization of the facial nerve trunk and its primary bifurcation, though mapping distal nerve branches remains technically challenging. Quantitative parameters and radiomic profiles may contribute to peritumoral risk stratification, but they are not yet validated as standalone methods for detecting true occult perineural invasion or microscopic malignant features. Fusing these imaging findings with patient-specific 3D models provides structural information that may facilitate the consideration of targeted surgical approaches, such as retrograde nerve tracing. While these advanced modalities serve strictly as adjunctive tools to optimize preoperative planning, they cannot replace intraoperative judgment or established safety protocols-continuous neuromonitoring and meticulous surgical technique remain essential for optimizing functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.