Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344642›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of transfusion science

Higher prevalence of anti-S and anti-M in South India: A single-center cross-sectional analytical study.

P Sriraman, Dibyajyoti Sahoo, Abhishekh Basavarajegowda, Esha Toora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of transfusion science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P SriramanDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Dibyajyoti SahooDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Abhishekh BasavarajegowdaDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Esha TooraDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlloimmunization, a dreadful complication of blood transfusion, varies between populations and geographical regions. The antibody prevalence of the South Indian population was studied as the data were scarce. Rh-Kell matching is traditionally followed, but other alloantibodies may have higher prevalence because of geographical variation. MATERIALS AND

methodsIt is a retrospective study on alloantibody prevalence in a tertiary care hospital in southern India from April 2021 to March 2023. The frequency, prevalence, and proportion of them are studied.

resultsOut of 6640 patients, 1128 (16.98%) were Rh D negative. One hundred and thirty-three patients have 155 alloantibodies, among which anti-D is the most common (1.02%), followed by anti-C (0.21%) and S (0.19%), with none having anti-Kell alloantibodies. Here, 1.58% of alloantibodies are formed against Rh and Kell blood group system, whereas 1.94% are against Rh MNS and system.

conclusionAnti-M and anti-S are common alloantibodies prevalent in the southern India population besides Rh. The focus should be given to Rh-MNS-matched blood in our population.

Indexed as

Alloantibodyantibody identificationantibody screeninganti-Manti-SRh–Kell

Identifiers

PMID42344642
PMCPMC13290271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.