ArticleAsian journal of transfusion science
Review of transfusion practices and its outcome in trauma patients at an urban level 1 trauma center in India.
Article in Asian journal of transfusion science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transfusion Practices in Severely Injured Patients at a Level 1 Trauma Center.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shockArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextImplementation of appropriate transfusion strategy in a timely manner is of paramount importance during the initial resuscitation of massively bleeding trauma patients. Assessing transfusion patterns can help in planning, resource allocation, and devising proactive strategies for the management of such patients.
aimsTo analyze transfusion requirements and its triggers in massively bleeding trauma patients. SETTINGS AND
designRetrospective analysis of the transfusion practices for massively bleeding trauma patients requiring immediate blood transfusion.
methodsClinical and transfusion details were collected from patient and the blood bank records, for massively bleeding trauma patients ≥18 years, and required at least 3 units of red blood cells (RBC's) within 1 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive analysis for transfused blood components was done. Followed by regression analysis to identify predictors for transfusion.
resultsA total of 215 (8.4%) patients, received at least 3 units of RBCs within the 1
conclusionsMaintenance of a ratio of 1:1:1 can improve the early outcome in these patients. SI alone can be used as an important clinical tool for predicting transfusion at the time of preliminary evaluation of the bleeding trauma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.