ArticleIndian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India2026
Validation and Comparative Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Questionnaires Among Indonesian Nasal Fracture Patients Post-rhinoplasty.
Article in Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Successful nasal reconstruction requires both aesthetic and functional restoration. Evaluating outcomes necessitates validated instruments that capture patient satisfaction, functional improvement, and quality of life, including the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory (FROI-17) questionnaire, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale, and EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire. This study aims to validate the Indonesian versions of the ROE and FROI-17 questionnaires and to assess the correlation of ROE, FROI-17, and NOSE scores with EQ-5D in patients undergoing nasal fracture reconstruction. Materials and Methods: A two-phase cross-sectional study was conducted. Phase 1 included 30 outpatients for questionnaire validation. Phase 2 involved 40 patients who underwent nasal fracture reconstruction and completed pre- and postoperative assessments using ROE, FROI-17, NOSE, and EQ-5D. Results: The Indonesian ROE and FROI-17 demonstrated strong item-level validity (Spearman's Conclusion: The Indonesian versions of ROE and FROI-17 are valid and reliable instruments for outcome evaluation after nasal reconstruction. ROE showed the strongest correlation with EQ-5D, supporting its use as a comprehensive measure of postoperative quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.