Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344546›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026

Immigration enforcement in hospitals: a framework for health systems.

Joseph V Sakran, Karey McDonough, Zakk Arciaga, Bellal Joseph

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph V SakranSurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1510-3032
Karey McDonoughJohns Hopkins Medical Institutions Campus, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Zakk ArciagaTrauma, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2606-9084
Bellal JosephGrady Health System, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospitals are intended to be spaces of diagnosis, treatment, and healing, yet health systems are increasingly confronting immigration enforcement activity in and around clinical settings, including emergency departments, inpatient units, and other restricted care areas. These encounters may introduce fear, operational uncertainty, and ethical tension for patients, families, clinicians, and institutional leaders. In high-acuity environments such as trauma bays, perioperative areas, and emergency departments, the presence of enforcement personnel may be particularly disruptive to rapid clinical decision-making, patient trust, and the delivery of uninterrupted care. This perspective article proposes a practical, nonpartisan framework to guide health system responses to immigration enforcement encounters in clinical spaces. The framework is grounded in core legal and ethical obligations, including protection of patient confidentiality, compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, adherence to the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, and maintenance of clinical boundaries between public and non-public hospital areas. We outline a three-phase approach: preparation before an encounter occurs, a stepwise real-time response, and post-event support for patients and staff. Key recommendations include establishing a clear written policy, designating a 24/7 legal or administrative point of contact, training frontline staff not to make legal determinations, aligning electronic health record practices to minimize unnecessary documentation of immigration status, preserving clinical care during enforcement encounters, and using structured debriefings after events. A trauma-informed approach is essential, recognizing that enforcement activity may reinforce fear, institutional mistrust, and prior experiences of violence or coercion. By standardizing protocols and centering patient care, hospitals can protect confidentiality, support clinicians, reduce operational confusion, and preserve their fundamental mission as places of healing without fear or favor.

Indexed as

Emergency TreatmentEthicshealth policyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42344546
PMCPMC13289347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.