ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026
Workplace violence in trauma centers is a serious problem: an AAST Disaster Committee survey on assaults on trauma teams.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Workplace violence in trauma centers and emergency departments requires a thoughtful comprehensive innovative response.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Violence against healthcare workers (HCWs), especially in emergency departments and trauma centers (TCs), is a significant and growing problem. HCWs have the highest numbers and annual rates of workplace violence (WPV) compared with any other private industry sector. There is less information about the rates of violence and stalking against trauma providers in TCs. We hypothesized that a majority of trauma surgeons and team members have experienced deliberate assaults in their TCs. Our secondary hypothesis was that a majority of trauma providers consider WPV a significant issue in their workplace. Methods: The American Association for Surgery of Trauma Disaster Committee invited 2,100 members to participate in an online survey in May and July 2024. Questions evaluated practice type, TC characteristics, training, experience with WPV, beliefs about WPV prevention, and potential WPV prevention strategies interventions. Results: The survey response rate was 10.9%, yet the prevalence of WPV in TCs was reported to be high. 63.9% of respondents were aware of a deliberate assault on an HCW in their TC or system. 42.5% had been assaulted personally, and 7.5% suffered injury as a result of a deliberate assault. Respondents generally agreed on the need for WPV prevention measures such as prevention education, metal detectors, armed police, or security, and were aware of deaths and disabilities among HCWs after assaults. However, they did not personally see WPV as a significant issue in their TCs. Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of WPV with significant effects on the entire trauma workforce, including elevated levels of emotional distress, burnout, post-traumatic stress disorder, and long-term irreversible physical injuries and deaths. Respondents agreed on the need for preventive measures but did not view WPV as a major issue in their own TCs. Research into this discrepancy, as well as effective strategies to reduce WPV in TCs, would support advocacy for improved legislation and policies aimed at preventing WPV in healthcare. Level of Evidence: V - Survey of expert opinion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.