Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344541›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026

'Not the basic ABC of how you control a blood vessel': perceptions of UK Defence Medical Services personnel toward live tissue training for the surgical management of trauma.

C S Swain, M G Harjani, G Helgesson, R F Rickard, K Karlgren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. You Can't Clamp What You Can't Find.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C S SwainDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management & Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0273-9653
M G HarjaniDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management & Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
G HelgessonDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management & Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
R F RickardAcademic Department of Military Surgery & Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK.
K KarlgrenDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management & Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: 'Live tissue training' (LTT) is simulation using live anaesthetized animals as human patient substitutes. The educational benefits specific to LTT are unclear. This study aimed to explore the perceptions and attitudes of UK Defence Medical Services (DMS) personnel toward the use of LTT in the surgical management of trauma. Methods: Five virtual focus groups were conducted, with 20 regular and reservist DMS personnel representing surgical specialties, anesthesia, emergency medicine and primary care. Participants discussed their experiences of LTT and the impact on their professional development. Systematic text condensation was used to thematically analyze transcribed data. Results: Six themes were constructed, titled: (1) Conclusion: DMS personnel report positively about LTT, consider it to be realistic (higher fidelity) simulation training, and have educational and moral rationales to justify its use. The educational attributes of LTT appear to be context-specific and dependent on DMS learner role. This knowledge should influence the design and delivery of military trauma simulation involving live animals, allowing for replacement, reduction and refinement in their use for training different cohorts of learners. Level of evidence: 6 - qualitative research.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalEmergency Treatmentgeneral surgeryWar-Related Injuries

Identifiers

PMID42344541
PMCPMC13289371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.