ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026
Predictors of survival after penetrating cardiac trauma: injury patterns and presentation factors.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heart of the matter: the physiology that determines survival.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Penetrating cardiac trauma is associated with high mortality. Factors influencing survival remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to identify injury patterns and presentation characteristics associated with survival after penetrating cardiac trauma at an urban, level 1 trauma center. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with penetrating cardiac trauma identified from the hospital trauma registry between 2017 and 2025. Patients with documented penetrating cardiac injury were included. Demographic, physiological, and injury characteristics were compared between survivors and non-survivors using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Pearson's χ Results: Among 18 041 trauma activations, 57 patients with penetrating cardiac injury were identified. Overall survival was 25%. Gunshot wound (GSW) was the most common mechanism of injury (67%) and was associated with a higher risk of mortality compared with stab wound injuries (SWIs) (OR 3.70, 95% CI 1.10 to 12.1). Multichamber cardiac injury (OR 10.9, 95% CI 1.26 to 1439), thoracic vascular injury (OR 12.3, 95% CI 1.43 to 1615), and concurrent abdominal injury (OR 4.40, 95% CI 1.12 to 24.7) were associated with death. Conversely, isolated cardiac injury (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.75), spontaneous respirations (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.24), and signs of life on presentation (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0 to 0.10) were predicted survival. Conclusion: Penetrating cardiac trauma carries a high mortality rate. Survival was associated with SWI, preserved physiologic status on presentation, and injuries isolated to the heart, whereas GSW and concurrent thoracic vascular or abdominal injuries were associated with death. Recognition of these factors may assist clinicians in early triage and resuscitative decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.