ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Objective verification of continuous speech sound discrimination using the acoustic change complex.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of using the acoustic change complex (ACC) as an objective cortical marker of continuous speech sound discrimination using connected Ling-six stimuli. Design: Cortical auditory evoked potentials were recorded from 10 young adults with normal hearing using a continuous, pause-free sequence of the six Ling phonemes (/u-a-i-ʃ-s-m/). ACC responses were recorded in a passive listening paradigm with minimal electrodes. Reproducibility was assessed in a subset of participants retested 1 year later. Results: Robust ACC responses were elicited for all six phonemic transitions in every participant, indicating reliable cortical discrimination within the continuous speech stream. Although response morphology varied across listeners, within-subject responses demonstrated strong reproducibility over a one-year interval (mean cross-correlation = 0.95). Conclusion: Continuous Ling-six stimuli reliably evoke ACC responses reflecting cortical speech sound discrimination. This efficient and repeatable paradigm shows promise as an objective verification tool for auditory learning and sound discrimination, particularly in populations for whom behavioral assessment is unreliable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.