ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Cross-attention guided multi-modal network for breast ultrasound diagnosis incorporating objective clinical semantics.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast ultrasound diagnosis is significantly constrained by operator subjectivity. While Deep Learning shows promise, existing models often neglect the structured morphological semantics essential for radiological reasoning. Methods: We propose Cross-Attention Guided Network (CGA-Net), a multi-modal framework that fuses visual data with objective clinical descriptors via a cross-attention mechanism. Specifically, clinical features-such as shape and margin-act as semantic queries to dynamically highlight pathological regions. Results: Validated on 252 patients using a rigorous Out-Of-Fold (OOF) prediction strategy to prevent data leakage, the CGA-Net trained from scratch demonstrated the most balanced clinical utility, yielding a robust OOF AUC of 0.905 with the highest overall accuracy (0.857) and an optimally balanced specificity (0.831), while maintaining excellent sensitivity (0.898). Furthermore, a pre-trained version of CGA-Net achieved a peak overall ranking AUC of 0.915. Both multi-modal configurations substantially outperformed the robust clinical-only baseline (0.890) and the image-only baseline (0.795). Conclusions: This suggests that while transfer learning aids general feature extraction, strong cross-modal semantic guidance alone is highly effective at reducing false positive diagnoses and optimizing practical clinical thresholds. Attention map visualization confirmed that the model aligns closely with expert focus on tumor periphery. CGA-Net offers a robust, interpretable, and data-efficient "second opinion" tool to reduce diagnostic variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.