ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Middle cerebral artery fenestration presenting with cerebral ischemia: a case report and review of the literature.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Middle cerebral artery (MCA) fenestration is a rare vascular variant that can mimic stenosis. Its association with cerebral ischemia remains controversial. Method: We report the case of a 53-year-old man with a history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), initially misdiagnosed with left MCA occlusion, who presented with sleep disturbances due to fear of stroke recurrence. A definitive diagnosis of MCA fenestration was established by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and high-resolution magnetic resonance vessel-wall imaging (HRMR-VWI). Perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) was employed to evaluate the associated hemodynamic compromise. A literature review was conducted to identify all reported cases of MCA fenestration associated with cerebral ischemia. Results: A total of 19 cases (including ours) from 12 studies were identified. Patients were predominantly male, with ages ranging from 4 to 85 years. All fenestrations were located in the M1 segment. Slit-like morphology was observed in 73.7% of patients and was more frequent in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) than in TIA (91.7% vs. 42.9%). Eleven patients (57.9%) were definitively diagnosed via DSA. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed in six patients with concurrent MCA occlusion, yielding favorable functional outcomes in five (83.3%). Overall, 73.7% of patients achieved favorable outcomes at follow-up. Conclusion: MCA fenestration should be considered in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with cerebral ischemia and M1 stenosis or occlusion, particularly in the absence of conventional vascular risk factors. A slit-like morphology may be associated with a higher risk of stroke. Multimodal imaging is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and guide appropriate clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.