ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Bridging technology and pedagogy: evaluation of an interprofessional course on technology-enhanced learning for health professions educators.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The proliferation of educational technologies presents both opportunities and challenges for health professions educators. A prior institutional needs assessment found that educators across all professions struggle to adopt these technologies, as they must navigate not only technical requirements but also the pedagogical principles that govern their effective use. This descriptive study evaluated a 4-credit interprofessional Executive Certificate (EC) designed to equip educators with the technological tools and the underpinning pedagogical principles to support their use. The course participants include doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, and education support administrative staff actively involved in teaching and learning within the institution. Methods: Graduates across 5 years (2021-2025) of the Technology Enhanced Learning for Health Professions Education (TEL4HPE) were invited to complete an online survey that assesses the outcomes at Kirkpatrick Level 2 (self-efficacy), Level 3 (behavior), and Level 4 (results). The survey was designed to measure self-efficacy in TEL competencies, behavioral changes in teaching practice and organizational impact using Likert-scale and slider-scale items analyzed with descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis test and one-way ANOVA. Results: Seventy-one participants completed the survey (44.1% response rate) from across six professional groups. They reported high confidence in applying educational principles ( Conclusion: The TEL4HPE program was associated with high self-reported confidence, reported changes in teaching practice, and perceived organizational influence. The interprofessional cohort model provides a promising approach to faculty development for health professions educators, with implications for institutional design and support of TEL initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.