ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2026
Generative AI-Assisted Indication of Anatomical Landmarks to Enhance Safety under Intraoperative Bleeding in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.
Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to present a novel approach that integrates a generative adversarial network (GAN) into the inference process of surgical navigation artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Background: Safe laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer relies on accurate identification of anatomical landmarks, such as the pancreas and dimpling lines (DLs). We developed a gastric cancer/gastrectomy AI (gAI) to indicate these landmarks. However, intraoperative bleeding often obscures the operative field, reducing the effectiveness of gAI. Methods: We created gAI-with-GAN by integrating a CycleGAN-based generative model into gAI to remove intraoperative bleeding during the inference process. We compared gAI-with-GAN with gAI using 30 LG videos categorized by bleeding severity. Expert surgeons evaluated the software usefulness, using a 5-point Likert scale and Dice coefficients. Results: In massive bleeding cases, gAI-with-GAN outperformed gAI. The median Likert scores for identifying the pancreas and the DL between the mesogastrium and pancreas improved from 3 to 4 ( Conclusions: Integrating generative AI improved the quality of anatomical landmark indications, even under intraoperative bleeding during LG. This approach may enhance surgical safety in minimally invasive surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.