ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2026
"It's Either Have Surgery or Die": How Patients Perceive the Choice to Undergo High-Risk Abdominal Surgery for Cancer.
Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine how patients undergoing high-risk abdominal cancer surgery perceive the decision to proceed with surgery, particularly regarding whether surgery is experienced as a choice or a perceived necessity. Background: Patients considering high-risk abdominal cancer surgery face decisions about whether or not to proceed with surgery, yet prior work suggests that patients may not fully perceive surgery as a choice. How patients make sense of surgical decisions remains poorly understood. Study Design: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with adults scheduled for or recently undergoing curative-intent abdominal cancer surgery at 2 academic centers from 2023 to 2024. Thirty-four participants completed 45- to 60-minute in-depth interviews exploring expectations, decision-making experiences, and perceptions of surgical choice. Transcripts were deidentified, coded by a multidisciplinary team, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis informed by grounded theory techniques, with iterative content mapping to identify cross-cutting themes. Results: Participants described a continuum of perceived choice. Some recalled surgeons explicitly offering options and felt they were making an intentional choice, although others viewed surgery as technically optional but effectively unavoidable given a perceived lack of meaningful alternatives, their desire for a cure, or strong recommendations from clinicians or family. A subset reported no perceived decision at all, describing surgery as a predetermined step or an event that simply happened. Across categories, patients frequently equated surgery with survival, which shaped whether alternatives felt viable. Surgeon communication and patient perception did not consistently align, as explicit options did not always translate into a perceived sense of agency. Conclusions: Patients considering high-risk cancer surgery often perceive limited or no choice, even when surgeons describe options. Recognizing how patients interpret choice may help refine shared decision-making approaches and guide the development of communication tools for complex surgical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.