Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344454›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2026

Integrating Mental Health Into Surgical Care: A Qualitative Study of a Perioperative Mental Health Intervention.

Joanna Abraham, Joanne Wang, Alicia Meng, Katherine J Holzer, Ana Baumann, Mary Politi, Caitlin Bess, Michael S Avidan, Eric J Lenze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joanna AbrahamFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Joanne WangFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Alicia MengFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Katherine J HolzerFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Ana BaumannDepartment of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Mary PolitiSchool of Public Health, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Caitlin BessFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Michael S AvidanFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Eric J LenzeDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To explore patient experiences with a perioperative mental health intervention (PMHI), understand its perceived impact on emotional health, and identify factors affecting engagement and feasibility. Background: Depression and anxiety can worsen surgical outcomes in older adults, highlighting the need for perioperative emotional health support. We evaluated a PMHI across 3 linked randomized controlled trials in cardiac, oncologic, and orthopedic surgery. Here, we report qualitative findings highlighting patients' experiences with the PMHI across trials. Methods: The study was conducted across 3 hospitals in a Midwestern healthcare network. 112 semi-structured interviews were conducted with older patients undergoing surgeries (31 cardiac, 39 oncologic, and 42 orthopedic), complemented by 5 periodic reflection focus groups with 9 interventionists (4 social workers/counselors and 5 pharmacist team members). An inductive thematic approach was used for analysis. Results: Patients and interventionists perceived the PMHI positively, identifying numerous beneficial factors such as compassionate care, strong rapport, and thorough medication education. However, patients noted nonbeneficial factors limiting engagement with the PMHI, including fatigue and competing personal priorities. Patients with oncologic or complex cardiac procedures reported the greatest benefit from the PMHI, compared with slightly lower perceived usefulness among orthopedic and simpler cardiac patients. Informed by these findings, we present a conceptual model illustrating beneficial and nonbeneficial factors influencing patient perceptions of the PMHI. Conclusions: Patients' positive perceptions of the PMHI and its impact on alleviating depression and anxiety symptoms underscore the value of integrating psychological and pharmacological support into perioperative care for older adults.

Indexed as

anxietybehavioral treatmentcoordinationdepressioninterviewsmedication counselingpolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID42344454
PMCPMC13290208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.