ReviewAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2026
Enhancing Graduate Surgical Education: Recommendations for Development of Common Surgery Education and Training Accreditation Standards.
Review in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Concerns persist within the surgical community that completion of an accredited surgical residency no longer consistently ensures that trainees are ready for independent practice. In response, the Independent Committee for Graduate Surgical Education (ICGSE) was established in January 2025 to address the unique requirements of surgical training. The committee's mandate was to recommend program standards that would potentially optimize education and training for surgical residents, with the goal of improving patient care. Methods: The ICGSE, consisting of 71 surgeons across 16 specialties, reviewed the history of surgical accreditation and relevant literature. Workgroup-led discussions identified strategies for improving trainee readiness and modernization of program accreditation standards. Results: A literature review showed a "readiness gap" affecting 20%-30% of surgical trainees across multiple specialties. Key areas for improvement include:1. Designing curricula that increase clinical exposure, promote progressive autonomy, and facilitate transition to independent practice.2. Aligning training with the realities of surgical practice.3. Balancing accreditation requirements with efforts to reduce administrative burden and enhance faculty development.4. Emphasizing program evaluation beyond board passage rates and surveys to include real-time and longitudinal tracking of skill and clinical judgment acquisition.5. Supporting faculty education in teaching and assessment.6. Providing clear developmental roadmaps for lifelong learning. Recommendations: 1. Modernize accreditation through application of continuous quality improvement processes.2. Implement an outcomes-focused curriculum adaptable to each specialty that encourages innovation.3. Supplement case logs with an evidence-based framework for assuring procedural competency.4. Require standardized nontechnical skills training and assessment.5. Establish a longitudinal, competency-based assessment system.6. Mandate verifiable faculty development with institutional support. Conclusions: The ICGSE recommends that the graduate surgery education community, in collaboration with oversight organizations and professional associations, work to develop common surgery-focused accreditation standards that would drive the excellence required in surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.