ArticleSSM. Mental health2025
Implementation, sustainability, and impact of Common Elements Treatment Approach in Ugandan healthcare facilities.
Article in SSM. Mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building the foundation: Training, stakeholder engagement, and planning for Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) implementation in Uganda.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The health and social consequences of untreated mental health disorders and heavy alcohol use are substantial, particularly in settings with high HIV-prevalence. Transdiagnostic approaches may offer a more efficient public health response, particularly where behavioral health services are limited. The present study explored the implementation of Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA), a transdiagnostic intervention, in Western Uganda, from the perspectives of multilevel stakeholders. One-on-one in-depth interviews with multilevel stakeholders involved in the rollout of CETA in Uganda were conducted (n = 20) including Ministry of Health officials (n = 2), CETA trainers (n = 2), clinic managers (n = 5), and frontline providers (n = 11) involved in the rollout of CETA. Data were thematically analyzed and organized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0). Key themes that emerged, organized by CFIR 2.0 domain and construct, included the acceptability and perceived need for CETA (and its perceived advantages over existing behavioral health services), the importance of expanding CETA beyond healthcare facilities into communities (through a task-shifting approach that leverages community health workers) to reduce provider fatigue and eliminate transportation related barriers to patient retention, and the necessity of building in-country capacity to support long-term sustainability and the train-the-trainer apprenticeship model. This qualitative implementation assessment provides suggestions for optimization of CETA delivery for this context in future implementation. Rigorous testing of CETA is needed to examine both implementation and effectiveness outcomes in Uganda.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.