Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344412›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2026

Technical factors associated with biliary cannulation success after transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy.

Wei-Chih Su, Tsung-Hsien Hsiao, Chia-Chi Wang, Hung-Da Chen, Tzu-Hsiang Kung, Chih-Hsiang Chen, Jiann-Hwa Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei-Chih SuDepartment of GastroenterologyTaipei Tzu Chi HospitalTaipei CityTaiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6252-3590
Tsung-Hsien HsiaoDepartment of GastroenterologyTaipei Tzu Chi HospitalTaipei CityTaiwan.
Chia-Chi WangDepartment of GastroenterologyTaipei Tzu Chi HospitalTaipei CityTaiwan.
Hung-Da ChenDepartment of GastroenterologyTaipei Tzu Chi HospitalTaipei CityTaiwan.
Tzu-Hsiang KungDepartment of GastroenterologyTaipei Tzu Chi HospitalTaipei CityTaiwan.
Chih-Hsiang ChenDepartment of GastroenterologyTaipei Tzu Chi HospitalTaipei CityTaiwan.
Jiann-Hwa ChenDepartment of GastroenterologyTaipei Tzu Chi HospitalTaipei CityTaiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy (TPS) is a rescue technique for difficult biliary cannulation, but the factors associated with its success remain incompletely defined. In this study, patient-related and technical variables associated with biliary access after TPS were evaluated. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 92 endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP) procedures requiring TPS between 2016 and 2023. Because additional incisions could be created after unsuccessful attempts, a total of 115 TPS sessions were analyzed. Patient characteristics and technical parameters, including papilla morphology, incision extent, and exposure, were assessed. Incision extent was categorized using the midpoint of the papillary oral protrusion as a visual landmark and the post-TPS orientation of bile and pancreatic orifices was documented. Results: The overall biliary cannulation success rate was 93.5%. In the session-level analyses, Haraldsson type 2 papillae were associated with lower success, whereas long incisions, defined as those extending beyond the midpoint, were independently associated with higher success (odds ratio 3.71, Conclusions: TPS outcomes are associated mainly with technical factors, with type 2 papillae showing reduced success. Longer incisions were associated with higher biliary access rates and the bile duct orifice typically was upper-left of the pancreatic orifice after TPS.

Indexed as

ERC topicsPancreatobiliary (ERCP/PTCD)Performance and complicationsQuality and logistical aspectsTraining

Identifiers

PMID42344412
PMCPMC13289974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.