ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Efficacy and safety of transcatheter left atrial appendage closure guided by transoesophageal echocardiography using standard and micro TEE probes: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter left atrial appendage closure (T-LAAC) represents an effective alternative to long-term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and contraindications to oral anticoagulants. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the standard imaging modality for procedural guidance, while micro-TEE may allow adequate imaging under conscious sedation, potentially simplifying procedural workflow. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of micro-TEE compared with standard TEE guidance during T-LAAC. Methods: Single-center, retrospective study, all consecutive patients undergoing T-LAAC between June 2021 and August 2024. Patients were stratified according to intraprocedural imaging guidance (micro-TEE vs. standard TEE). Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and short-term outcomes were analyzed. A subgroup analysis excluding patients who underwent simultaneous combined atrial fibrillation ablation procedures was performed to reduce confounding. Results: A total of 47 patients were considered; one was excluded due to poor view in both imaging modalities, for a total of 46 patients. 38 procedures were performed under standard TEE and 8 under micro-TEE guidance. No differences in baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were found. Procedural success was similar, with one failure in the standard TEE group due to the unavailability of the right size of the closure device. No significant differences were observed in periprocedural complications, including mild pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, device-related thrombosis, or significant peridevice leak. Micro-TEE guidance was associated with a significantly shorter procedural time (153 vs. 175 min, Conclusion: The use of micro-TEE during T-LAAC procedures did not show a significant difference in procedural success rate and was not associated with an increased complication rate compared with standard TEE guidance. The use of micro-TEE showed a reduction in total procedural time, partly due to the reduced need for OTI, without an increase in radiation exposure, fluoroscopy time, and contrast use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.