ArticleVeterinary world2026
Field evaluation of
Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Ectoparasites are a major constraint to cattle productivity, welfare, and health under pasture conditions. Conventional chemical control methods are increasingly limited by the development of resistance, environmental contamination, and residue accumulation in animal products. Plant-derived insecticidal formulations combined with precision livestock technologies represent a promising alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the field effectiveness and safety of a Materials and Methods: A total of 145 clinically healthy cattle maintained under uniform pasture conditions were included in a prospective field trial. The biopreparation contained Results: Laboratory assays demonstrated significant concentration-dependent insecticidal activity, with mortality reaching approximately 86.0%-87.7% across the tested ectoparasites at higher concentrations, comparable to that of a synthetic reference insecticide. Under field conditions, complete suppression of detectable ectoparasite infestation was observed at days 7 and 14 following completion of the cumulative dose. Partial re-infestation occurred by day 21, with efficacy ranging from 66.7% to 88.6% depending on parasite species. Seasonal dynamics indicated high baseline infestation levels, particularly for Conclusion: Automated cumulative application of an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.