ArticleVeterinary world2026
Global scientometric analysis of
Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Materials and Methods: A descriptive observational scientometric study was conducted using the Scopus database. A structured search strategy identified 104 relevant documents published between 2019 and 2024. Bibliometric indicators, including publication output, citation metrics, and author h-index, were analyzed using SciVal and Bibliometrix in R. Keyword co-occurrence, thematic evolution, and international collaboration networks were evaluated to map research dynamics. Results: A total of 104 documents from 70 sources were analyzed, showing a slight negative annual growth rate (-5.59%). The mean document age was 2.64 years, with an average of 3.17 citations per publication. Research output involved 503 authors and 223 keywords, reflecting moderate thematic diversity but limited international collaboration (6.73%). Original articles predominated (n = 80), followed by reviews and other document types. Publication activity peaked in 2020 and 2022, with most studies appearing in mid-tier journals. Thematic analysis revealed a transition from early focus on infections and dog bites toward meningitis, bacteremia, and zoonotic diseases. Keyword clustering highlighted "meningitis," "bacteremia," and "dog bites" as central research themes. Spain and Belgium emerged as leading contributors in international collaborations, although global networking remained limited and unevenly distributed. Research trends increasingly emphasized zoonotic aspects of Conclusion: This scientometric analysis highlights evolving research priorities in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.