ReviewBurns & trauma2026
Diagnostic strategies in necrotizing soft tissue infections: from clinical scores to multi-omics and machine learning.
Review in Burns & trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent a group of rapidly progressing, life-threatening infections characterized by widespread tissue necrosis, systemic inflammation, and multiorgan failure. Early diagnosis remains a clinical challenge because of nonspecific initial manifestations and overlapping symptoms with other soft tissue infections. Diagnostic scoring systems such as the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score and its variants have been widely utilized to facilitate early recognition but are limited by variable sensitivity and insufficient predictive value across diverse clinical populations. Recent advances in multi-omics technologies and machine learning approaches have enabled the identification of molecular biomarkers and predictive patterns associated with NSTI onset and progression. Integration of high-dimensional omics data with clinical and imaging parameters holds potential for dynamic, real-time diagnostic support, and individualized risk stratification in the intensive care setting. This review summarizes the evolution of diagnostic strategies for NSTIs, critically appraises the limitations of conventional clinical scoring systems, and examines emerging omics-based and ML-driven approaches. Finally, we propose an integrated diagnostic roadmap that aligns clinical assessment, imaging, microbiologic evaluation, host-response biomarkers, and multi-omics data to guide future research and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.