Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344314›Full record

ReviewBurns & trauma2026

Diagnostic strategies in necrotizing soft tissue infections: from clinical scores to multi-omics and machine learning.

Xiaolin Ji, Xinze Li, Zhongqiu Lu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Burns & trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaolin JiDepartment of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Nanbaixiang Street, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.
Xinze LiDepartment of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Nanbaixiang Street, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.
Zhongqiu LuDepartment of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Nanbaixiang Street, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6210-163X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent a group of rapidly progressing, life-threatening infections characterized by widespread tissue necrosis, systemic inflammation, and multiorgan failure. Early diagnosis remains a clinical challenge because of nonspecific initial manifestations and overlapping symptoms with other soft tissue infections. Diagnostic scoring systems such as the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score and its variants have been widely utilized to facilitate early recognition but are limited by variable sensitivity and insufficient predictive value across diverse clinical populations. Recent advances in multi-omics technologies and machine learning approaches have enabled the identification of molecular biomarkers and predictive patterns associated with NSTI onset and progression. Integration of high-dimensional omics data with clinical and imaging parameters holds potential for dynamic, real-time diagnostic support, and individualized risk stratification in the intensive care setting. This review summarizes the evolution of diagnostic strategies for NSTIs, critically appraises the limitations of conventional clinical scoring systems, and examines emerging omics-based and ML-driven approaches. Finally, we propose an integrated diagnostic roadmap that aligns clinical assessment, imaging, microbiologic evaluation, host-response biomarkers, and multi-omics data to guide future research and clinical translation.

Indexed as

Diagnostic scoring systemsMachine learningMulti-omics biomarkersNecrotizing fasciitisNecrotizing soft tissue infections

Identifiers

PMID42344314
PMCPMC13289853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.