ArticlePlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Integrative Analysis of Abiotic Stress-Responsive Genes in Soybean Using Differential Gene Expression and Validation With Machine Learning.
Article in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing frequency and intensity of climate-associated abiotic stresses highlight the need to better understand soybean stress-response mechanisms. In this study, transcriptomic data from 112 soybean samples exposed to multiple abiotic stress conditions, including drought, salinity, and heavy-metal stress, were integrated using a multi-layer computational framework. By combining differential expression analysis, Differential Gene Correlation Analysis (DGCA), Random Forest, XGBoost, functional enrichment, and network-based interpretation, the analysis prioritized 37 candidate genes associated with abiotic stress responses across heterogeneous experimental contexts. Functional enrichment analyses indicated that these candidates were associated with amino acid biosynthesis, energy metabolism, carbon metabolism, glycolysis, secondary metabolite biosynthesis, and ROS-related processes. DGCA further suggested stress-associated changes in gene-gene correlation patterns, supporting the presence of condition-dependent transcript coordination rather than direct causal regulation. Among the prioritized candidates, GLYMA_16G207700, GLYMA_16G204600, and GLYMA_16G214500 emerged as high-priority genes based on multi-layer analytical support, chromosomal localization, and comparative genomic evidence. Their orthology or syntenic relationships with loci in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.