Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344278›Full record

ArticleCase reports in ophthalmological medicine2026

Montage Error in Ultra-Widefield Imaging of Retinal Hemangioblastomas.

Mohamed Belmouhand, Jens Folke Kiilgaard, Carsten Faber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in ophthalmological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Montage Error in Ultra-Widefield Imaging of Retinal Hemangioblastomas.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed BelmouhandDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, gentoftehospital.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5855-4733
Jens Folke KiilgaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, gentoftehospital.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-1460
Carsten FaberDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, gentoftehospital.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2517-7270

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 20-year-old male presented with three large retinal hemangioblastomas in the left eye. At the 5-week follow-up, automated montage ultra-widefield imaging appeared to demonstrate a fourth lesion, suggesting possible disease progression. Clinical examination, however, confirmed the presence of only three tumors. Re-evaluation of the automated image stitching revealed misidentification of the optic nerve head in one of the source images, resulting in image misalignment and the false appearance of an additional lesion. Systemic evaluation demonstrated central nervous system hemangioblastomas and a renal cyst, and genetic testing confirmed von Hippel-Lindau disease. This case illustrates both the diagnostic utility and limitations of ultra-widefield montage imaging and highlights the importance of clinical verification of apparent lesion increase before concluding true progression.

Indexed as

artifactretinal hemangioblastomaultra–widefield imagingvon Hippel–Lindau

Identifiers

PMID42344278
PMCPMC13287962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.