ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Predictors of Matching into Plastic Surgery Residency Integrated and Independent Tracks: A Systematic Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Plastic surgery residency training in the United States consists of 2 main pathways: the integrated and independent tracks. As more programs continue to transition to only offering the integrated model, competition for both tracks remains intense, with national match rates steadily declining in recent years. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on predictors of successful match outcomes in both integrated and independent plastic surgery residency programs. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies examining predictors of match success in plastic surgery residency programs. We analyzed academic metrics, including United States Medical Licensing Examination scores, Alpha Omega Alpha membership, and research productivity, as well as nonacademic factors such as letters of recommendation, leadership experience, extracurricular involvement, and interview performance. Results: Strong academic performance was consistently associated with match success for both tracks, including high United States Medical Licensing Examination scores, significant research output with a high number of publications and first-author studies, and Alpha Omega Alpha membership. Nonacademic qualities, such as impactful letters of recommendation, leadership roles, and excellent interview skills, also significantly contributed to favorable outcomes. Between the independent and integrated pathways, there was a difference in levels of importance among these predictors, as institutional pedigree of prerequisite surgical training and number of interviews were all more emphasized in the independent track. Conclusions: By identifying and evaluating predictive factors for matching into integrated and independent plastic surgery programs, this review offers updated, evidence-based insights to help applicants optimize their residency applications and assists programs in refining selection criteria for this highly competitive specialty.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.