ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Measuring and optimizing spatial accessibility to emergency medical services with a focus on age-based spatial variations in EMS risk.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) play a crucial role in safeguarding public health, yet their efficiency is highly dependent on spatial accessibility and optimal facility location. Existing research often evaluates EMS spatial accessibility using total population counts, overlooking the heterogeneity of EMS risk across space and age groups. This study aims to improve EMS accessibility measurement and spatial optimization by integrating spatial and demographic variations in EMS risk. Method: An integrated framework combining a modified two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) model and two spatial optimization models-the Maximum Covering Location Problem (MCLP) and the P-median model-were developed. The improved models incorporate spatial and age-based EMS risk derived from 2024 EMS records in Wuhan, China. Comparative analyses were conducted between traditional and risk-integrated models to examine differences in accessibility and optimal station layouts. Results: Findings reveal significant age-related and spatial variations in EMS risk, with older adults populations showing markedly higher risks, and high-risk areas concentrated in central and near-suburban districts. Compared to traditional 2SFCA results, the improved model produced significantly different accessibility distributions, particularly in peri-urban areas. In optimization analyses, risk-integrated MCLP and P-median models located new EMS stations closer to near-urban areas, whereas traditional models favored peripheral suburbs. Conclusion: Incorporating spatial and demographic variations in EMS risk substantially enhances the accuracy of accessibility measurement and optimization outcomes. The results underscore the importance of prioritizing high-risk older adults populations, strengthening EMS capacity in urban cores, and improving coverage in underserved suburbs. This framework offers a transferable tool for developing more efficient and equitable EMS systems in rapidly urbanizing and aging regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.