ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Trainees' experience and expectations of cerebrocardiac health advisors training programs in China: a mixed-method study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cerebrocardiac health advisors (CHAs) play a pivotal role in coordinating neuro-cardiovascular care. However, systematic trainee-centered evaluations of training programs remain scarce. Understanding their experiences and expectations is essential for evidence-based program optimization and strengthening the frontline public health workforce. Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods study was conducted in Hubei Province, China, including 126 survey respondents and 11 interviewees. Quantitative data were collected using a validated cross-sectional survey (content validity index = 0.96) to assess training necessity, content needs, and acceptability. Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled trainees and analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: Most trainees recognized training as necessary (98.41%, 124/126) and were willing to participate (97.62%, 123/126). Stroke screening and prevention was rated the most essential curriculum component, whereas stroke research received the lowest priority. Although 97.62% ( Conclusion: This study reveals strong trainee demand for professional development while identifying critical gaps in current CHA training. Evidence-based recommendations include extending training duration, expanding curricular scope, implementing competency-tiered instruction, and integrating interactive pedagogies. These findings provide policymakers with actionable insights to align CHA training with frontline practice needs, which may ultimately improve the quality of cerebrocardiovascular care coordination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.