ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Shame in sport: tracing the past and looking to the future.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shame serves as a crucial perspective for investigating individual sports withdrawal. Over the past two decades, this research topic has boomed rapidly in the field of social psychology of sport, with scholars conducting systematic explorations on its measurement tools, antecedent variables and action mechanisms. However, existing studies lack a systematic sorting and comprehensive understanding of its process mechanisms. First, this paper combs the research evolution of shame in sport, clarifies its evolutionary trends, and summarizes the limitations of existing measurement scales. Second, it generalizes the influencing factors of shame in sport from the perspectives of behavioral subjects and behavioral environments. Third, it clarifies the double-edged sword effect of shame on individuals in the field of sport and its contingency moderating factors. On this basis, the paper finally discusses the key problems and challenges faced by this research field, and focuses on the future research directions, aiming to theoretically deepen and expand the research content of shame in sport, and provide evidence-based references for improving sports participation and mental health in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.