ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2026
NanoBind: Mechanism-Driven Deep Learning of Nanobody-Antigen Molecular Recognition.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanobody-antigen molecular recognition underpins nanobody discovery and development, necessitating accurate determination of binding occurrence, interface residues, and affinity. Current predictors are architecturally designed for the massive, heterogeneous spectrum of general protein-protein interactions, diluting the limited, complementarity-determining region (CDR)-dominated nanobody-antigen interaction (NAI) data and masking the decisive CDR signal. The scarcity of experimental affinity data precludes direct regression-based estimation of binding affinity. Here, we present NanoBind, a mechanism-driven deep learning framework that embeds the CDR-dominated binding pattern within its encoder, enabling robust prediction of binding occurrence and interface residues from limited NAI data. Constrained by scarce affinity data, NanoBind generates quantitative affinity ranges for nanobody-antigen pairs without extra experiments. Systematic benchmarking demonstrates that NanoBind surpasses state-of-the-art methods in accuracy and robustness, and interpretability analyses confirm that the model's decisions align with the CDR-dominated binding mechanism. When million-sequence immune repertoires are screened against 4 antigens, NanoBind reduces candidate nanobodies to fewer than 100 per target. For the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike receptor-binding domain (RBD)-nanobody F2 complex, NanoBind correctly predicts binding occurrence, matches experimentally validated interface residues, and generates an affinity range quantitatively supported by molecular dynamics simulations. A server is available at http://liulab.top/NanoBind/server.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.