ArticleJournal of patient experience2026
Understanding Platelet Donor Experience in Greece: Satisfaction Drivers, Service Gaps, and Implications for Service Design.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was the first to evaluate platelet donor satisfaction in Greece, addressing a gap in patient experience research related to apheresis services. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 120 voluntary platelet donors recruited from five public hospital blood donation units in Attica between February and April 2025. Donor satisfaction was assessed using an adapted Greek version of the Blood Donor Satisfaction Questionnaire (BDSQ), which measures access/convenience, technical aspects, and interpersonal aspects of care. Overall satisfaction was high, with donors reporting the greatest satisfaction with interpersonal aspects, particularly staff politeness, respect, and attentiveness. Technical aspects, including hygiene, safety, and professional competence, were also rated positively. In contrast, access and convenience received only moderate ratings, with staff shortages, limited operating hours, and long waiting times identified as key sources of dissatisfaction. Repeat donors reported slightly higher satisfaction than first-time donors. Strong positive correlations among satisfaction dimensions underscored the holistic nature of donor experience. Overall, the findings highlight the need for targeted operational improvements to enhance service quality and support sustained platelet donor engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.