ArticleASPET discovery2025
Strain-dependent neuronal disposition and toxicity of paclitaxel in mice.
Article in ASPET discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ribociclib is not a substrate or inhibitor of Oatp1b-mediated uptake in vivo.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Article
- Role of solute carrier transporters in the biodistribution and toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Unveiling the peripheral nerve hallmarks of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: insights from paclitaxel treatment in a murine model.Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Paclitaxel is an antineoplastic agent that is associated with debilitating adverse effects, especially paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN). Although preclinical models have been used to characterize the mechanisms underlying PIPN, experimental differences in these models, including the dose, route, schedule of the drug, and the species and strain of the animals used, limit our ability to compare and interpret results. Furthermore, uncertainties persist regarding potential dependence of paclitaxel disposition and toxicity on the route of administration or genetic background of the animal model. In this study, we address this gap by systematically investigating the relationship among route- and strain-specific pharmacokinetic profiles, organ accumulation, and the associated toxicity phenotypes in preclinical models of PIPN. Using a panel of 7 commonly used mouse strains, we observed that the plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel are strain dependent. Using 2 representative strains (C57Bl/6 and CD2F1), longitudinal studies show similar results for distribution of paclitaxel in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) within the peripheral nervous system, with a 2-fold magnitude of difference. Ensuing studies indicated that the accumulation of paclitaxel in the DRG is correlated with susceptibility to mechanical allodynia, a key marker of PIPN. Our study implies that DRG accumulation, rather than plasma exposure, contributes to the development of PIPN, and this understanding is expected to inform the further development of translationally relevant models and effective therapeutic strategies for managing PIPN. Significance Statement: This investigation compares paclitaxel pharmacokinetics using 7 strains of mice and 2 routes of administration and longitudinally explores pharmacodynamics using 2 representative strains, which informs cross-study comparisons and the validation of translationally relevant model systems. These findings support the notion that accumulation within dorsal root ganglia, rather than plasma exposure, is correlated with the development of peripheral neuropathy. This insight is anticipated to guide the future development of effective therapeutic strategies for managing paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.