ReviewNursing research and practice2026
Diagnostic Technologies for Urinary Retention in the Postoperative Period of Arthroplasties: An Integrative Review.
Review in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Technologies for Urinary Retention in the Postoperative Period of Arthroplasties: An Integrative Review.Nursing research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To identify diagnostic technologies for postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty surgeries. Design: Integrative review. Data Sources: Searches were conducted in April 2024 in the following databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL. Review Methods: Studies published in the last 10 years, without language restriction, were included. The search strategy combined the terms "postoperative," "arthroplasty," "diagnosis," and "urinary retention." Study selection and analysis followed PRISMA recommendations. Data were analyzed descriptively and synthesized qualitatively. Results: A total of 34 studies were included, comprising 36,736 participants. Bladder ultrasound was recommended in 73.5% of the studies as the primary diagnostic technology. The most frequent urinary volume thresholds indicating catheterization ranged from 400 to 500 mL, with postvoid residual volumes around 150 mL also reported. Conclusion: Bladder ultrasound is the most recommended diagnostic technology for postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty. However, further studies are needed to validate its use across different clinical contexts and populations. Impact: The findings support the incorporation of bladder ultrasound into clinical protocols to improve early diagnosis, reduce unnecessary catheterization, and enhance patient safety in postoperative care. This review also highlights the need for greater involvement of nursing professionals in research and clinical application of diagnostic technologies. Patient or Public Contribution: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.