Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344159›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026

Research priority setting for unpaid carers of older adults, patients with palliative care needs and at the end of life in Australia.

Sara Javanparast, Philip Martin, Annie Dullow, Allison Willis, Oluwatomilayo Omoya, Jennifer Tieman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara JavanparastResearch Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0388-5524
Philip MartinConsumer representative.
Annie DullowConsumer representative.
Allison WillisCarers SA, Adelaide, SA.
Oluwatomilayo OmoyaResearch Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.
Jennifer TiemanResearch Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2611-1900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Carers are individuals who provide unpaid care to family members and friends with disabilities, medical conditions, mental illness, or who are frail and aged. The contribution of carers to the Australian health, aged care, disability, and social care systems is significant. However, they face high levels of emotional, social, physical, and financial burdens. The Australian Government has recently introduced policy reforms to improve recognition of carers. However, there is limited evidence on research priorities to facilitate the translation of policies into practice. Objective: To involve Australian stakeholders to a) identify evidence gaps and research needs; and b) set research priorities for carers within the context of ageing, palliative care and end of life. Design: Stakeholder consultation study for research priority setting. Methods: Australian stakeholders with expertise in areas related to carers, aged care, and palliative care were engaged through an online survey, a research roundtable and a focus group to discuss research priorities for carers. The survey qualitative responses, notes from the roundtable, and focus group transcript have been summarised and analysed thematically, using NVivo 14 qualitative software. Results: Two main considerations as found from the study are 'what to research' and 'how to research' to improve recognition and support of carers in Australia. Research priorities identified include recognition and early identification of carers, timely and equitable access to support services, helping carers navigate services, support during the transition of care, post caring, including grief and bereavement support, evaluation of existing services, and carer self-care and wellbeing. Participants commented on the importance of research that engages carers meaningfully, respectfully, and in a timely and flexible manner to ensure maximum impact. Conclusion: This study guides the design of carer-centred research to facilitate the translation of carer policies into practice. It also assists in evaluating the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and sustainability of existing and new support services.

Indexed as

ageingcarers involvement and engagementpalliative care and end of lifepolicy translationresearch priority settingunpaid carers

Identifiers

PMID42344159
PMCPMC13287418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.