Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344140›Full record

ArticleSSM. Mental health2021

Is there an optimal screening tool for identifying perinatal depression within clinical settings of sub-Saharan Africa?

Anna Larsen, Jillian Pintye, Amritha Bhat, Manasi Kumar, John Kinuthia, Pamela Y Collins, Grace John-Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna LarsenDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jillian PintyeDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Amritha BhatDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Manasi KumarDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
John KinuthiaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Pamela Y CollinsDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Grace John-StewartDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Delivering PrEP in PregnancyR01AI125498 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN-STEWART, GRACE C. · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
Evaluating Infant PrEP Exposure During Pregnancy and BreastfeedingR01HD100201 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PINTYE, JILLIAN · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
PrEP optimized for mothers (PrOM): efficient PrEP integration in MCH clinicsR01HD094630 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN-STEWART, GRACE C., KOHLER, PAMELA · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Mapping impact and developing mitigation strategies for climate change-mental health nexus in the context of vulnerable adolescent populations in KenyaK43TW010716 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI · PI KUMAR, MANASI · 2018 to 2022
$648k
Evaluating maternal depression among adolescent and adult women in KenyaF31HD101149 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LARSEN, ANNA M · 2019 to 2022
$125k
FIC NIH HHS K43 TW010716NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125498NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD101149NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094630NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide and the most common complication of the perinatal period. Women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are disproportionately impacted by perinatal depression. Maternal and child health (MCH) clinics are widely attended in SSA, offering a potential access point for depression screening. Yet, selection of optimal depression screening instruments for use within MCH clinics in SSA remains unclear. We synthesized evidence depicting relative strength of perinatal depression screening scales for use among African perinatal women within four evaluation domains: 1) diagnostic performance, 2) cultural adaptation, 3) feasibility and ease of implementation, 4) experience using the tool in SSA perinatal populations. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) had the most evidence among peripartum women in SSA, and a balance of feasibility, diagnostic performance metrics, and cultural adaptations. Other depressive screening instruments developed for general populations show strengths for application in African perinatal populations in at least one evaluation domain. Building health services capacity to integrate depression screening within routine MCH visits is an important next step to address perinatal depression in SSA.

Indexed as

DepressionEdinburgh postnatal depression scaleMental healthPatient health Questionnaire-9PerinatalPostpartumPregnancyScreeningSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID42344140
PMCPMC13288248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.