ArticleReading & writing quarterly : overcoming learning difficulties2026
Reading Errors of Importance: The Role of Word Frequency and Relevance in Passage-Specific Comprehension.
Article in Reading & writing quarterly : overcoming learning difficulties, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reading efficiently and accurately is critical to reading comprehension. Determining what words are important for readers to know and be able to read accurately to support passage-specific comprehension is less understood and has been conceptualized differently throughout the literature. Two ways of conceptualizing word importance, word relevance, as measured by Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), and word frequency, were the focus of the current study. 191 adolescent participants (97 males and 94 females, 9-14years old) read two informational passages and the number of errors was recorded. Each word's frequency and TF-IDF per passage was determined. Random effects logistic regression models were used to determine if word frequency and word relevance metrics independently predicted the number of errors for each passage. To examine how word frequency and relevance impact passage-specific reading comprehension, each error was classified by frequency and relevance level (e.g., low relevance-mid frequency) and then the number of errors in each category was used to predict passage comprehension outcomes. Results revealed that the two concepts of word importance are not redundant in predicting reading errors. The number of errors on low frequency-high relevance words predicted passage-specific comprehension across passages (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.