Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344139›Full record

ArticleReading & writing quarterly : overcoming learning difficulties2026

Reading Errors of Importance: The Role of Word Frequency and Relevance in Passage-Specific Comprehension.

Natalie B Huerta, Jessica A Logan, Laurie E Cutting

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reading & writing quarterly : overcoming learning difficulties, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalie B HuertaDepartment of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jessica A LoganDepartment of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Laurie E CuttingDepartment of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Cognitive and Neural Processes in Reading ComprehensionR01HD044073 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2004 to 2019
$8.1M
Early Academic Achievement and Intervention Response: Role of Executive FunctionR37HD095519 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Laurie E Cutting · 2018 to 2026
$5.1M
Neural Correlates of Discourse Processing in AdolescentsR01HD109151 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Laurie E Cutting · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
Predicting Late-Emerging RD: Neurobiological and Cognitive FactorsR01HD067254 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044073NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067254NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD109151NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD095519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reading efficiently and accurately is critical to reading comprehension. Determining what words are important for readers to know and be able to read accurately to support passage-specific comprehension is less understood and has been conceptualized differently throughout the literature. Two ways of conceptualizing word importance, word relevance, as measured by Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), and word frequency, were the focus of the current study. 191 adolescent participants (97 males and 94 females, 9-14years old) read two informational passages and the number of errors was recorded. Each word's frequency and TF-IDF per passage was determined. Random effects logistic regression models were used to determine if word frequency and word relevance metrics independently predicted the number of errors for each passage. To examine how word frequency and relevance impact passage-specific reading comprehension, each error was classified by frequency and relevance level (e.g., low relevance-mid frequency) and then the number of errors in each category was used to predict passage comprehension outcomes. Results revealed that the two concepts of word importance are not redundant in predicting reading errors. The number of errors on low frequency-high relevance words predicted passage-specific comprehension across passages (

Identifiers

PMID42344139
PMCPMC13289664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.