ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Botulinum toxin treatment for multiple sclerosis and post-stroke spasticity in clinical practice: differences in injection doses and patterns.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A) is a safe and effective treatment for spasticity in both multiple sclerosis (MS) and post-stroke spasticity (PSS). This single-center retrospective study compared injection patterns and dosages between these two conditions. Methods: Thirty-three people with MS (PwMS) and 55 people with PSS treated with BoNT-A at our outpatient spasticity clinic were analyzed. Clinical and demographic data, BoNT-A dosages, upper- and lower-limb dosing, patterns of injected muscles, and their respective dosages were collected. BoNT-A treatment doses and injection patterns were compared between groups. Patient-reported benefit was also recorded. Results: PwMS more frequently received treatment in lower limbs and lower total doses of BoNT-A. Patients with PSS were more commonly treated in distal upper-limb muscles. In the lower limbs, PwMS were more frequently treated in the adductor muscles and rectus femoris, while patients with PSS were more often treated in tibialis posterior. In MS, higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were associated higher total BoNT-A dosage. Discussion: MS-related spasticity mainly affects the lower limbs and less frequently upper limbs, and requires lower BoNT-A dosages compared with PSS. In contrast, PSS is characterized by more prominent distal spasticity, particularly in the upper limbs. Treatment patterns and BoNT-A dosing are influenced by these differences in spasticity distribution. We hypothesize that the need to preserve residual motor function, particularly in lower limbs, may have contributed to lower BoNT-A doses in MS, although not systematically investigated. Despite being only marginally assessed, treatment efficacy appeared to be similar in both groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.